Sunday, July 13, 2008
No Country For Old Men - You can’t take your eyes off this one!!
Cast: Josh Brolin, Javier Bardem, Tommy Lee Jones
Directors: Ethan and Joel Coen
Plot: A hunter, an old sheriff and an assassin’s life cross path in the 80’s when a drug deal goes wrong and a cat ‘n mouse chase that follows it.
Bottomline : Absorbing!!
Great things are done simple. You don’t need a complex plot filled with zig-zag narrative, twist endings and multi-level plots to make great cinema. Great cinema can be made by just capturing exactly what happens in a story. Outright realism is what transpires into greatness on screen. And you can’t complain to the Coen brothers for doing just that.
‘No Country for Old Men’ in the hands of lesser mortals would have easily become one of those run-of –the-mill guns n’ thrills movie that we see every summer. But when such a plot as simple this fall into the hands of the not-so-less mortals, we see a movie where you are literally sitting there in the hall with your mouth wide open.
At the end of the movie, the average viewer is left in no doubt as to how a thriller has won four academy awards over some three hour long romantic drama movie. The treatment of the plot is absorbing at worst, its cant-take-your-eyes-off at best. The Coen's recurrent strains of fate and circumstances only add to the intrigue. You will never look at a coin toss the same way after you watch this movie. Nor will you look a bullet wound or a suitcase the same way after you see this one. Roger Deakins camera captures 80’s Texas to its fullest extent. Sound editing is another high point of the movie. Lack of background score adds to the intensity of the movie. This is one more after ‘I am Legend’ this year to have used silence as an integral part rather than a vague necessity.
Tommy Lee Jones’ portrayal as the fatigued, old sheriff under whose very eyes anarchy ensues, is very moving. He looks every inch an 80’s character and is an embodiment of the ‘tired’ tone of the movie. Josh Brolin as Llewelyn Moss, the hunter who becomes the hunted, is one character who hasn’t got much to do other than run and dodge bullets. His character is not a waste but rather a clog in the plot. But the real screen stealer is the sociopathic assassin, Anton Chigurh (Spanish actor Javier Bardem) sent out to recover the money lost in the deal. Cold, unassuming and heartless, his character breathes evil through every pore and represents the ideas of the movie.His character is through which the Coen brothers reach out to the audience. His dialogue delivery, voice modulation disturbs you. A sure-shot winner for the Oscars. A corker of a role!!! Hats Off…
Rating: 8.5/10 (Two Thumbs Up)
Monday, January 14, 2008
Atonement- AMAZING.... but Oscars???....
Cast: Keira Knightley, James McAvoy, Saoirse Ronan.....
It is painful to see a movie fall short of itself."What if" analysis aside, "Atonement" could have been a much better movie than it turns out to be at the end. You go to the cinema hall
expecting a sensitive take on Ian McEwan's much talked about novel of the same name. Instead
you get pretty much less than what you bargained for. Inadequate character development,
a running time that is thinner than Keira Knightley, inconsistent acting, crisp editing which is
uncalled for marks "The Atonement". The film's saving grace is the overall plot coupled with
some brilliant engineered sequences which are sure to go down as some the best scenes seen in
Hollywood recently. The film yet again marks the crisp directing skills of budding director Joe
Wright after his faithful adaptation of Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice".
Film is basically the narration of two sisters and a man whose lives are ireevocably changed
when the younger sister, out of jealousy accuses the man (who is in love with the elder sister)
of a crime he did not commit. The movie is divided into three parts, each of them representing
childhood, teenage and old age of the younger sister. The first part is a well devised comment on
perception and reality. Saorise Ronan as Briony Tallis, an oddly matured child with a penchant
for writing disturbs you with her probing eyes. Keira Knightly impresses but she looks
as though she is from a concentration camp. Surely women in that age were not anorexically thin, were they? James McAvoy has a static role to play and impresses you.
I think you should watch "The Atonement" for only three things. Direction, direction and the third?? Yeah you got it wrong... cinematography. The Dunkirk evacuation sequence in the movie will go down as the one of the best tracking shots ever made. Five minutes of unedited footage in a camera that follows the protagonist's walk through this historic episode enthralls. Hats off!!
On the editing part of movie making, this is one film where the editing had to be in such a way
that there is enough time for the characters to develop. Instead a movie goer is put in a odd
position of concluding that the film was too short (usually its the other way around). True, the film is painfully short, a little over two hours. At the end you feel as though the movie
could have been easily 30-40 minutes longer.
Overall the movie could have been as popular and acclaimed as its book only if the screenplay had been a bit more fluid and a tad longer. Nonetheless its a movie to
watch out for but frankly I dont expect many oscars for this movie expect for the original score and Saorise Ronan's part.
My Rating: 7.5/10
Sunday, January 13, 2008
I am Legend- Not your deja vu horror movie
Cast: Will Smith, Will Smith, Will Smith and others....
Director: Francis Lawrence
Story: Robert Neville, a military scientist is the lone survivor of a disease that has wiped a whole world of people and changed many of them into blood thirsty creatures. He races against time to find a cure to this disease.
Bottomline: Heralding a new variant of horror movies.
"I am legend" could have easily have been a typical zombie-ridden horror movies with a lot of blood and gore thrown in, on the lines of movies like the "Resident Evil". But surprisingly it turns out to be a much more realistic and sensitive story, contrary to what it seems to offer to viewers. So if you are expecting (or hoping) to see Will Smith wielding 4 feet long guns and blasting zombies to smithereens, then you would better tear up that movie ticket in your hands. On the other hand, if you are willing put on your brains to watch this movie, you might be pleasantly surprised and impressed by the innovative treatment of this genre, which is more sensitive and less in-your- face action.
The movie is about the daily life of a military scientist Robert Neville (Will Smith), who is the lone survivor of a pandemic on earth. The movie chronicles his struggle to find a cure for this disease and save the world. He also has to save himself from blood-thirsty, nocturnal creatures that this disease has created out of humans.
Essentially a semi-horror plot, but this movie has a heart in it in the form of Will Smith who lends immense credibility to his part and the plot. It is a movie which revolves around him and only him. The actor has single-handedly carried this movie on his shoulders. Emoting alone is never easy, but Smith impresses. His role draws a fine line between sanity and insanity without overindulging in both. The scene where he goes in search of his dog in a dark building filled with zombies has to be appreciated for both its sound editing and Smith’s impeccable handling of the scene. Listen to Smith’s breathing in that scene and how he calls for his dog. A brilliant and memorable sequence!!
Minimum use of dialogues, absence of background score, importance given in many scenes to silence are some contextual high points in this movie. However, the technical aspects especially the CGI employed for the zombies are a let-down. The “virtual zombies” seem hell-bent on disobeying all laws of physics and believability to their roles. The director could have used actors with prosthetic make-up with better results in this regard. If he thought actors wouldn’t have been believable enough, he better watch a screening of the LOTR series in which Peter Jackson used prosthetic make-up on actors portraying as orcs with great results.
HK’s Verdict: Personally a very good movie. But for people going to theatres with preconceived notions, you have been warned. An empty New York is a sight to behold in this movie. How many times do you go to cinema and end up looking at a desolate NYC?
Rating: 7.5/10(Hollywood Standard)
Saturday, December 8, 2007
The Simpsons- D'oh!! This Movie was amazing!!!
Cast (voiceover): Dan Castellanata, Julie Kavner, Harry Shearer, Billie Joe Armstrong(Green Day lead singer) and loads others
Storyline: After Homer accidentally pollutes the town's water supply, Springfield is encased in a gigantic dome by the EPA and the Simpsons family are declared fugitives.
Bottomline: Its raining gags and gags...
Thankfully I watched this movie on dvd. Had i watched it in the cinema halls, I would not have
gotten half the plot because i would be laughing at a gag in the movie and by the time i complete laughing a dozen more gags would have gone by. This is a gag fest. I have seen pop culture satires, (Om Shanti Om, Shrek series for example) but nothing made me laugh as hard as this one. Many would have commented on the falling standards of the series but this one silences
them all. Hats off!! The family is truly back......
HK's Verdict: Please do watch this movie. I am sure you wont feel robbed.
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Beowulf - To CGI or not to CGI
Cast(voiceover & modelling): Ray Winston, Anthony Hopkins, John Malkovich
& Angelina Jolie
Director: Robert Zemeckis (Back to The Future, Forrest Gump...)
Story: A monster called Grendel ravages the kingdom of the Danes and a warrior called Beowulf comes and slays it only to enrage its mother.
Bottomline: Motion Capture animation Beta Version
To CGI or not to CGI, this is the dilemma that the director Robert Zemeckis seems to be in throughout this movie. What comes out finally is a half-baked product that wants to dazzle in all motion capture splendour but is pained by the budget constraints it faces under an unknown production house. Had it been fabricated by ILM(Industrial Light and Magic)
Also this movie reminds you a lot of '300' in terms of the sheer energy that it gives out.
In the acting department, everybody has done a commendable effort special mention to Ray Winston and Angelina Jolie. But however real the models look like they still have those soulless eyes that convey no emotion.
HK's verdict: Better ventures in the field of motion capture are expected. This is just a Beta version. The best is yet to come. But the graphics are superb nonetheless.
Rating: 6.5/10(Hollywood Standard)
Friday, July 13, 2007
Title: The Prestige
Director: Chritopher Nolan (Remember ?? director of Batman Begins and Memento...)
Cast: Christian Bale, Hugh Jackman, Scarlett Johannson,David Bowie,Michael Caine.
Story: The Story of two rival magicians and their efforts to outwit each other.
Bottomline:Abracadabra Alakhazam!!!
There are pretty few things in “the Prestige” that doesn’t work. Brilliant editing, superb cinematography(the walk up the hill at colorado heights is brilliantly designed), a cohesive script with twists and turns and a sincere performance from the lead cast leaves you spellbound and wanting for more when the final credits roll.
Christopher Nolan gives us what I would call a ‘Perfect Thriller’. I would define a thriller as a movie that is mysterious but clues as to what is going to happen at the end is spread throughout the movie and left in the open. Only that the viewer is lazy enough to work it out. The viewer wants to be fooled and he gets just that.
“The Prestige” is just the sort of the movie and much more. Director Christopher Nolan believes that the best way to hide a clue is to leave it out in the open. He gives us reasons why he is one of the most innovative directors around.
“The Prestige” is about two magicians Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman) and Borden (Christian Bale) who are friends at first but gradually fall out to a rivalry that turns ugly. Each of them tries to outwit the other by sabotaging the other’s magic shows. Who outwits whom is what forms the story.
The movie itself is designed like a magic trick which consists of three parts The Pledge (the magician shows you something ordinary), The Turn (magician then makes the ordinary do something extraordinary) and The Prestige (the magician then makes the extraordinary change back to normal). There are three sometimes even four streams of stories going along at the same time in the movie but not for one moment does the viewer get perplexed. The back and forth way of storytelling (a signature style of Nolan) makes the movie even more fascinatingly complex.
As for the acting Hugh Jackman revels in a role that requires a lot of showmanship. Christian Bale is brilliant as always. David Bowie is in one of the best supporting roles I have ever seen recently. Scarlett Johannson is
there to decept and deceive.
Rating: 9/10 (Masterpiece)
PS:
And by the way, the tagline of the movie is “Are you watching closely?”. Be sure to watch the movie closely or else you might need a second viewing. “The Prestige” is a movie that reiterates once again why we go to the cinemas in the first place. It also shows what writers can create when they just think harder than they usually do. Watch out for the end its
S-H-O-C-K-I-N-G!!
Friday, June 22, 2007
Shivaji:The Boss- Watch it not in Pirated VCD
Title: Shivaji: The Boss
Director:Shankar
Starring: "Superstar" Rajinikanth,Shriya Saran,Vivek,Suman,Raghuvaran, and loads of other guest appearances.
Story: Shankar's hero (no Superhero!!) tries to root out black money.
Bottomline: Shankar's Utopian Hero does it again!!
First things first. It would be an insult to the film's memory if this movie is watched in pirated VCD or DVD or if you guys are thinking that this film ought to be caught on cable television, you are missing a big treat. Nothing can do justice to this 3 hour long , rich celluloidian delight of a film than a DTS effect sound speaker system coupled with a 48 MB (megabytes) per frame other than a projector with a white screen in a cinema hall.
Yet the best part of Shivaji was this. When the film was annonced, I asked myself "How could this Shankar-Rajini combo work?"
One side was a director who revels in making magnum opus ishstyle (pun intended!!) movies ever since he made his debut in "Gentleman". One the other side lies an actor who revels in
punching his villains and his dialogues and who has a large fan following which even rivals a following of a political party (no Mr Rajinikanth I know you are not into politics but the
adjective was necessary)
But the biggest strength of Shivaji is that the movie has been into a reality without either
Rajini or Shankar coming out of their moulds. The script is not complex nor is it something that we have never come across in cinema. But its the packaging where the movie scores.
And oh boy oh boy!! Does it score!!
Acting: Rajini is in his belligerent self. Yet he doesn't turn preachy in this movie as well (he probably learnt this lesson from "Baba").Shriya Saran surprises you with her quiet portrayal as Thamizh. Yet her lip sync in dubbing is lousy (dubbing by Kanika of "Varalaru" fame).
Though she is portrayed as a quiet "Kudukmba Ponnu" (literally translates as family girl!!),
she turns into one of the most sexiest screen siren to have scorched cinema halls in the song sequences.
The best acting honours in the movie, however goes to the villain Adhi Seshan (Suman). As the menacing man behind the dark matrix-style sunglasses,Suman is in familiar grounds and hence revels. Vivek tickles you with his witty one-liners. Though some of his dialogues semm to have been taken straight from Crazy Mohan's book of comedy (katpadi rhyming with dead body is one such example). He even mimics Rajini in front of him much to the amusement of everybody. The twoof them imitating vadivelu is absolute magic and their
chemistry is palpable. Rajini proves that one doesnt need to make comedy by kicking the comedian around. Are you reading this Mr.Vadivelu? 1.6/2
Cinematography: National award winner KV Anand brings in his usual tricks of film making.
Cinematography is one of the biggest strength in this movie. His colour tones are so good that even the famine scorched earth in the first song appear artistic and beautiful. Eye-candy cinematography. 0.9/1
Editing: On seeing the starting sequences, I thought that this would be a long movie. But this so called long movie minimizes into 2 hour 45 minute long affair, crisper than potato chips Anthony scissoring abilities are getting better and better. He was superb in
"Vettaiyadu Vilaiyadu" and excellent in "Shivaji". The camera-ramping (a usual in Shankar movies) technique and ability to use connect different scenes is absolutely ingenious (that mms message part of the movie). 0.9/1
Music: When AR Rahman is at the helm in the music department, you should expect nothing less than magic from the "Mozart of Madras". The "Sahana" song is unforgettable piece and connoisseur's delight. The "Athiradee" song is literally foot-tapping. The "Style" song is an unique attempt in Hip-Hop and Funk genres. 1/1
Art Direction: The art direction by Thotatharani is simply amazing and award-winning (for sure). It still surprises me how he is able to create sets from a hut to a huge "Tower of Magi" style set in the "Vaaji Vaaji" song. 0.8/1
Others: Peter Hein's stunts, though a bit over the top sometimes is still very beleivable. CG animation is excellent and rivals even many Hollywood movie special effects. The Athiradee song is one example. It would be interesring Rajini's next project in Sultan, animated movie realeasing in 2008 made by Rajini's daughter.
In the starting sequence, the man next to Rajini's cell (no spoilers here!!) asks him why he was put in jail, to which he replies he did service to the people. To this the man quips "Then you ought to be put in jail!" . I started clapping to this dialogue (I was the only one clapping in the hall, but thankfully and sound from the movie drowned my singular attempt) amazed at the irony and the sting that the dialogue carried. There you knew Dialogue writer Sujatha has done his job.
Choreography is good and they have made it a point to make Rajini dance and he does his job gracefully.
Costumes by Manish Malhothra is stunning. Makes Rajini look chic and Shriya, a bombshell.
Makeup by Bhanu is simply superb. Makes the superstar look atleast two decades younger straight from his "Murattu Kalai" days. A welcome change from the gross makeup we saw in "Chandramukhi".
0.8/1
Script and Screenplay: Now this is the most important part of any movie. Though the movie doesnt fall flat on its face in this department, its still a tad repetetive on Shankar's part. The story seems to be a variant of "Indian","Gentleman"and many other of his works.
I think it is time for Shankar to take a well-deserved break and try his hand at more ralistic and low cost movies in the future. Though his production company boasts of down-to-earth movies like "Kadhal" and "Veyyil", The BOSS is yet to take a plunge in it. It would be refreshing to take a break after all!! Also the aftermath of the climax is also totally ignored as what happens after it comes during the credits. If his mission was to show his "message" then the director should not have set it aside in the credits.
1.6/3
Total: 7.6/10 (strictly to be watched in theatres if you want 3 hours of non-stop fantasy)